Acknowledgments in Neurology research articles: A contrastive study (English – Spanish)

نویسنده

  • María Ángeles Alcaraz
چکیده

María Ángeles Alcaraz María Ángeles Alcaraz Abstract This article reports the findings of a content analysis of acknowledgments, authorship and collaboration practices in a medical corpus made up of 100 Englishand 100 Spanish-written research papers, distributed in five blocks of 20 papers each, and randomly drawn in the period 2001–2012 from BMC Neurology and Revista Española de Neurología, two of the leading Neurology journals in their respective languages. In order to discover the similarities and differences between both samples, the objective of this contrastive research was three-fold: 1) to analyse the frequency, length and types of acknowledgments; 2) to examine the number of authors, sub-authors and unnamed individuals mentioned in the subtitles, acknowledgment sections, annexes and appendices of the research papers included in the whole sample; and 3) to explore the different types of collaboration among all the participants involved in the research. Although the types of acknowledgments are similar in both contexts, the English-medium sample presents more research papers with acknowledgments, more acknowledgments and longer acknowledgments. In both corpora public funding is the component which receives most acknowledgements, although again much more in English than in Spanish. Of the many people involved in the investigation, Spanish-speaking authors are more numerous than English-speaking authors, whereas English sub-authors and unnamed individuals outnumber their Spanish counterparts. As for the different types of collaboration, in the two samples ‘local’ collaboration clearly predominates above the remaining variants. Possible explanations for the differences and similarities observed, among them a possible correlation between the higher presence of acknowledgments and the research published in English, are provided. The results presented here give some hints about the collaboration and communication practices followed by two different language scientific communities. Acknowledgments in Neurology research articles

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Contrastive Investigation of Intertextuality in Research Articles Authored by Iranian vs. English Writers in Applied Linguistics

Academic discourse enables others' voices in a text to be realized through conventionalized citational patterns. However, form amongst a variety of factors, one thing which may influence the way others' voices are textualized is writers' affiliations to different cultures. Following this assumption, the present contrastive study attempted to explore manifest intertextual constructions across th...

متن کامل

The Role of Passive Voice in Hedging Medical Discourse: a Corpus-based Study on English and Spanish Research Articles

The appropriate use of hedging in scientific discourse is a vital skill for writers presenting their knowledge in an academic discourse community and much work has therefore been done on this relevant feature, especially on its use in the rhetoric of specialized texts in English. Some authors believe that there are considerable differences in styles of writing in particular cultures (e.g., see ...

متن کامل

Cross-Cultural Investigation into Generic Structure of Dissertation Acknowledgements in English and Persian: Reflections on Politeness Strategies

This contrastive study, in the first place, examined the generic structure and, in the second place, explored the face theory proposed by Arundale (2006) in 140 doctoral dissertation acknowledgments written by native speakers of Persian (NSP) and native speakers of English (NSE) in 7 disciplines representing soft sciences to find out what discourse genre components writers employ to articulate ...

متن کامل

A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Journalistic Writing in English and Persian: A Contrastive Linguistic Perspective

  This paper investigates the use of ‘lexical bundles’ in two broad corpora of journalistic writing. The aim of this study is to compare the use of lexical bundles in the two domains, one consisted of newspaper articles written in English and published in England and the other one comprised of newspaper articles written in Persian from Iranian publications. For this purpose, the frequency...

متن کامل

A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Journalistic Writing in English and Persian: A Contrastive Linguistic Perspective

  This paper investigates the use of ‘lexical bundles’ in two broad corpora of journalistic writing. The aim of this study is to compare the use of lexical bundles in the two domains, one consisted of newspaper articles written in English and published in England and the other one comprised of newspaper articles written in Persian from Iranian publications. For this purpose, the frequency...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014